Thursday, February 16, 2012

My dying bias

My bias is quite extensive in my personal history, and has caused me to have some hard personal reflections recently.  I like to think that I have made some healthy progress as I sift through these dissonances.  It has a lot to do with what we have been discussing in class, and also with that struggle I've been having throughout my phlogg thread.  Basically, it revolves around the question of sameness- are we all the same?  It is impossible to doubt this when we look at the American creed of "all men are created equal."  At the same time however, those of us who are in a classroom/school environment realize that there are some students who show more talent in one area or opposed to his fellow students.  For example is a gifted student the same as a student who struggles and/or is not interested in learning, or is a student that comes from a rich family the same as a student that comes from a poor family- if only by virtue of differences in ability/interest, or economics?  Obviously, they are not the same in their contextual relationships.  Does this difference require different approaches?  Conventional thought, ironically is yes- look at special ed/regular ed/gifted classes.  Do understandings about these students require different existential valuations?  Not necessarily if we acknowledge that each student is equal with respect to his right to attain his dreams, have a life of his choice, have equal access to all that life can offer.  If this is the criteria, then sameness is relatively easy to understand; this is something which was not easy for me to understand.  By strict virtue of becoming a teacher, a helping professional, I found it necessary to modify my notions and implications of sameness- not so much because I had to (I did have to), but because in order to be a great teacher, it requires as much compassion and deep understanding as it does knowledge and passion.  This position is simply inconsistent with any valuations or implications which stem from notions of any substantial, essential differences in each of us as we move through this fog known as the human condition.

18 comments:

  1. We are definitely not all the same and I think that is the wonderful thing about the world. Having so many different personalities in your classroom is going to be a hard thing to deal with but it is what makes things fun and interesting. Being able to adapt your teaching to different personalities is one of the things I am a little apprehensive of being able to do. Hopefully I will be able to succeed at it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting observations. You say they treat you poorly but do they do anything other than give you a bad tip. Are they rude or demeaning? You say that half of your family is Navajo. Have you ever asked any of them if there is some sort of cultural reason that they might do this? With the resources you have you should explore this more fully so that it does not affect your teaching. Just think in some cultures burping after a meal indicates satisfaction and praise for a meal. Some cultures eat with their hands at every meal and here we chastise our children if they do such behavior. So there very well may be a cultural reasoning behind this. Good luck I hope you figure something out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting topic, sameness. As I started my career in the educational field, I was a substitute teacher. I did a long term sub position, thinking how hard could this be. Five classes through out the day same subject different students. No problem I can do this. Turned out to be five classes but three different subjects and many personalities. Being able to adjust your teaching styles to the different learning styles of your students is a important skill to have.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, I'm super impressed! Don't remember putting anything explicitly Nietzschean in the blog, but it would make sense considering I love him. You must be a fan, or at least a lover of philosophy. Who is this? I'd love to chat more with you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  6. To Err in life is the essence of truth. If you won't reveal your identity, will you at least carry on a conversation for a bit?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nicely put. With regard to a more classic morality, you are most correct. However, error is the descriptive state of being in which one is carried through life on a course uncharted or unintended, most usually brought about by an unforeseen result of the struggle between both reason and emotion, and the Schopenhauerian boredom resultant of the nihilistic life. In my vocabulary, as an existentialist, error, sublimity, and virtue are all synonymous. Again, you are right- there is no sense in which error has any normative value, only descriptive.

    What state do you live in? You must realize my pleasant shock in finding someone like you with which to talk. Give me clues about yourself, and I'll do the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, if existential virtue exists, which I feel it does, then there is a state of morality after all. For instance, creating value and meaning is moral. Seeking dreams and passions and damn the consequences (even classical morality) is moral, etc. Basically any action or idea that serves the existentialist or romanticist's vision is moral. All this in addition to the notion of social contract which must exist so that the philosopher can seek freedom, etc. All this being said, error is possible if one chooses any number of actions, ideas, or paths that stray from living life honestly and to the fullest.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well I thought I knew who it was, hence my little clue in my first response to you which sparked this discussion. Secret identities are only fun if I will eventually have the opportunity to find out it is. Otherwise, its just another existential exercise in futility and frustration. Besides this is quite mean of you to dangle this amazing conversation and consequently this amazing mind which is my souls endeavor to find before my very eyes.

      Answer me this, am I in any danger in talking to you?

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A nit picker rather makes you a philosopher indeed. Now I'm pretty sure I know who this is. One's soul can see in the dark. Answer my previous question please.

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its funny, I knew it was you from the very first moment I read that posting. I guess that is meaningful in itself. I miss you too. These talks have sparked something in myself that has long gone quiet. Did you know I got a random threat from your guy a couple of weeks ago? If you didn't know, don't bring it up. Super nice to talk. I often think about how things could have been. Glad you're happy.

      Delete
  12. I feel like my spark will never go quiet :) a quiet sadness that is mine to bear. I'm happy to bear it. Please know I wish you a happy birthday every September 4. You are never far from my mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's a bigger reason you reached out. Why'd you pick "Leia". Did you mean for it to be a simple brief word?

      Delete