Wednesday, February 22, 2012
My school
I am not sure about the practicality of my school, but at this point perhaps that is not the point. When I think of what my ideal school would be like, I am reminded of medieval European curricula a la Boethius; basically it consisted of a "liberal education". A liberal education consisted of either the quadrivium which centered on arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music, or the trivium which consisted of grammar, rhetoric, and logic. I think my model would work best in a middle school context because of its three grade levels. Instead of 6th, 7th, and 8th being used to denote the grade level, each level would be known as history, philosophy, and social awareness. Within each level there would be a pretty standard array of subjects- math, science, language arts, etc. The main impetus driving this new design would be that in all subject areas of the history level or grade, history would be highlighted. For example, maybe a science class would focus on the history of science and its progression. In math, problems and equations will be sought after in a fashion that highlights specific historical events, perhaps learning how math was done in the Roman Empire, or the Enlightenment for instance. Other emerging educational tools are to be welcomed- such as was seen in the lesson surrounding the Brooklyn Bridge. The same would apply at the philosophy level. Here a deeper understanding of each subject would be uncovered- questions will be raised and studied about the nature of each subject; perhaps math class would use logic and syllogisms to study equations. The social awareness level would follow the same format with the emphasis focusing on things like social justice, the "politics of food"- basically uncovering social hegemony, privilege, and things that are hidden from the citizenry so as to bolster the power of one group over another. Also, taking an idea I heard from Devon in class, each level would utilize "community projects." The one Devon told me about centered around a garden that each class would help grow, foster, and cultivate. In addition to the basic tending of the garden, the garden would be used in science and math classes, for instance, as a practical means to learning these subjects; graphing growth, learning about how photosynthesis works, etc. This school would not be considered college preparatory, but would be curricula driven. The philosophy behind this is that great curricula which inspires and captivates students would give them the tools necessary, not only to be great independent citizens, but also to go to college if that is something they desired- personal responsibility, choice, and passion for life and learning will have to be key themes throughout all levels.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your ideas about focusing on history, philosophy, and social awareness at the 6th, 7th, and 8th grade levels sound very intriguing. I like how these foci are not necessarily taught directly but in the context of all subjects during each grade. This sounds like a great idea for a middle school charter school. My question is how would you expand/change these ideas for the high school level? This allows each subject to coalesce and interact with each other in way that each has the same focus with varied directions and goals. It seems you’re ahead when it comes to the “school project.”
ReplyDeleteI too am intrigued with your concept of modules, that is no set grades (1-12). You should in fact pass each module's material en total, before you go to the next level. To graduate with a certificate, you would need to prove that you have mastered all of the curriculum modules, maybe, up to several years early for the best and brightest. I believe that this will work, but, you face an uphill battle in today's school environment.
ReplyDeleteIf it is not broke do not mess with it, well it is broke so something needs to be fixed. I like your idea of modules and doing away with set grades. The system is broke and not sure of what it is going to take to get it back on the right path. Possibly getting back to basics is a start.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very intriguing idea. I would think this would be quite challenging in coordinating all of the teachers to be down the same path at the same time. I do agree though that this would greatly benefit the kids. Each element of the module would serve to solidify the concepts that each of the teachers is teaching. A single idea would act as a memory cue for so many other ideas. I would definitely like to observe some classes in such a school. What happens in this school if a particular module doesn’t include some subjects? Let’s say that the history teacher wanted to tackle Cro-Magnon man. How would you incorporate math into this module? If you were to just leave math out of the module would the math teacher just pick some random math to cover of an unrelated nature or would the math teacher work on teaching something other than math? All in all good idea Luke.
ReplyDelete